Download A Comparative Look at Regulation of Corporate Tax Avoidance by Karen B. Brown PDF

By Karen B. Brown

This quantity offers a desirable examine the anti-tax avoidance recommendations hired by way of greater than fifteen international locations in japanese and western Europe, Canada, the Pacific Rim, Asia, Africa, and the us. It surveys the similarities and variations in anti-avoidance regimes and comprises exact chapters for every kingdom surveying the ethical and criminal dimensions of the problem.  The proliferation of tax avoidance schemes lately signs the worldwide dimensions of an issue featuring a major problem to the powerful management of tax legislation. Tax avoidance consists of unacceptable manipulation of the legislations to procure a tax virtue. those transactions help wasteful habit during which firms input into problematic, circuitous preparations completely to lessen tax legal responsibility. It frustrates the facility of governments to gather adequate profit to supply crucial public items and companies. Avoidance of duly enacted provisions (or manipulation to safe tax merits accidental through the legislature) poses a possibility to the potent operation of a loose society for the advantage of a small team of participants who search the privilege of moving their tax burden onto others basically to compete on this planet of trade. In an international during which international treasuries fight for the assets to conflict terrorist threats and to safe a good lifestyle for materials tax avoidance can deliver economies with regards to the sting of sustainability. As tax avoidance is without doubt one of the best matters of such a lot international locations, the significance of this paintings can't be overstated. 

Show description

Read or Download A Comparative Look at Regulation of Corporate Tax Avoidance (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice) (English and French Edition) PDF

Best comparative books

A History of Corporate Governance around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers

For plenty of american citizens, capitalism is a dynamic engine of prosperity that rewards the daring, the bold, and the hardworking. yet to many outdoor the us, capitalism appears like an initiative that serves simply to pay attention strength and wealth within the fingers of some hereditary oligarchies. As A heritage of company Governance worldwide indicates, neither notion is inaccurate.

Labour Supply and Incentives to work in Europe

Labour provide and Incentives to paintings in Europe highlights contemporary advancements within the exertions provide in Europe and offers a close evaluate in their hyperlink with financial rules and hard work marketplace associations. regardless of significant adjustments in ecu exertions provide up to now few a long time, the present literature nonetheless lacks a accomplished research of the connection among hard work provide and hard work marketplace associations from a macro point of view.

Democratic legislative institutions: a comparative view

This article summarizes the study on, and reports of, democratic legislatures around the globe. It specializes in what legislatures are and what they do - as either outcome of and contributor to democratic self-government.

Beating the bear: lessons from the 1929 crash applied to today's world

Two times within the final century the customarily stalwart economic system of usa has crumbled—first in 1929, while the inventory industry crash that resulted in the nice melancholy hit, and back with the monetary marketplace meltdown of 2008-2009 that continues to be crippling a lot of the United States. whereas it truly is nonetheless too quickly to nation unequivocally how this newest fiscal catastrophe took place, it really is attainable to theorize that a lot of what has occurred might have been foreseen or even avoided—just because it might have been in 1929.

Extra info for A Comparative Look at Regulation of Corporate Tax Avoidance (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice) (English and French Edition)

Example text

2 Australia 45 main issue over which difficulty is arising at present is in relation to the necessity to consider the commercial aspects of the taxpayer’s purpose in entering into the transaction. The Full Federal Court does consider such aspects. The High Court does not and appears to decide the issue of purpose on a narrower basis – the form of the transaction and the manner in which it was effectuated. These two approaches produce markedly different results in practice. Since the Australian legislation provides the court with a formula for determining whether the taxpayer had a dominant purpose to obtain a tax benefit, this effectively removes any necessity to consider whether there was unacceptable tax avoidance or acceptable mitigation.

This depends on where the CFC is resident and whether it passes an active income test. 96 The rules were designed to prevent abuse of the control and substantial shareholder rules under the CFC regime, through Australian residents promoting the use of portfolio investment in companies in low tax jurisdictions, where distributions would be made by the release of capital rather than income. This would have the advantage of deferring the receipt of income and enabling Australian taxpayers to take advantage of the more favourable way in which capital gains are taxed in Australia.

2 Australia 45 main issue over which difficulty is arising at present is in relation to the necessity to consider the commercial aspects of the taxpayer’s purpose in entering into the transaction. The Full Federal Court does consider such aspects. The High Court does not and appears to decide the issue of purpose on a narrower basis – the form of the transaction and the manner in which it was effectuated. These two approaches produce markedly different results in practice. Since the Australian legislation provides the court with a formula for determining whether the taxpayer had a dominant purpose to obtain a tax benefit, this effectively removes any necessity to consider whether there was unacceptable tax avoidance or acceptable mitigation.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.92 of 5 – based on 43 votes